IN THIS ISSUE
John Weston
The Most Powerful Force in Investing
Lee Gettess' Market Sense
Ten Reasons Why Investing in Mutual Bank Conversions can be so Lucrative
My Million Dollar Fundamental System
QUICK LINKS 
JOIN OUR LIST
Join Our Mailing List
JOHN WESTON
 
 
John Weston 

John Weston, co-author of the Shoestring Millionaire, began studying trading in earnest only a few years ago, under the tutelage of his mentor and co-author, Chuck Hughes.

 

In his first year of trading, John earned profits of $251,652. Continuing to study technical analysis under Hughes, John did even better in his second year, earning profits of $800,098. Over this 2-year period, John fully mastered many of the Chuck Hughes systems and modified them to fit his less intense, simpler trading style. The result: accumulated trading profits and income of $1.051 Million within 24 months.

 

John Weston attended Villanova University and holds a BS degree with honors. He worked in the department of psychiatry at the  Thomas Jefferson University Hospital before moving into hospital administration where his responsibilities included performance improvement and infection control.

 

A ranked amateur player with the United States Tennis Association, John's interests include sports, travel, trading, and writing. His tennis team has won tournaments in Florida and New Jersey.

 

Mr. Weston is a member of the Burlington County Medical Reserve Corp., a county emergency response team. Born and raised in New Jersey, John recently used some of his trading profits to purchase his "dream home," a $3.9 million chateau-style house in Carmel, California.
OUR AUTHOR TEAM
 
Adam Oliensis 
Andy Chambers
Brian Schad 
Chuck Hughes
Darrell Jobman
Dave Caplan
Don Fishback
Ellie Taft
Gary Wagner
George Angell
George Fontanills
Glenn Neely
Jack Schwager
Jeff Horovitz
Joe Duffy
Jon Najarian
John Weston
Kathy Lien
Ken W. Chow
Larry Connors
Larry Williams
Lawrence McMillan
Lee Gettess
Mark Fisher
Murray Ruggiero
Paul Forchione
Peter McKenna
Ray Frazier
Russell Sands
Scott Krieger
Ted Tesser
Tom DeMark
Tony Catalfamo
Welles Wilder
July 14, 2010     

Inside Trading this week features John Weston, who discusses what he considers to be the most powerful force in investing.

Next, Lee Gettess presents his market expectations for the coming week.

Then, Chuck Hughes examines why investing in mutual bank conversions can be profitable.

Last, Larry Williams tells us the three fundamentals he watches when investing in commodities.

Enjoy!
 
Adrienne LaVigne
TradeWins Publishing
The Most Powerful Force in Investing
 

By: John Weston

 

The following is an excerpt from John Weston's Shoestring Millionaire 

 

To the average investor the stock market can seem complicated and confusing.  Stocks can go up or down for no apparent reason.  Intel reports great earnings but the stock plummets.  The price of oil drops and the inflation report is tame but the major stock market indexes dive.  Pfizer reports terrible earnings but the stock rallies.  The Friday Employment Report is dismal but the Dow Jones Industrial Average soars.  When it comes right down to it, the reason why stock prices are going up or down seems to be anybody's guess.  You might as well try to read tea leaves.

Discover the most powerful force in investing
Lee Gettess' Market Sense
 
Lee Gettess is a top trader who is excited to bring you his new video newsletter. Each week, Lee will share his predictions on what he anticipates from the bond and S&P markets.
 
Ten Reasons Why Investing in Mutual Bank Conversions can be so Lucrative
 
By: Chuck Hughes
 

The following is an excerpt from

Chuck Hughes' Fail Safe Now Financial Program 

                

The performance figures presented in this article demonstrate that investing in mutual banks that convert to stock ownership can be very lucrative even if you invest after the Initial Public Offering.  Listed below are some of the reasons why this type of investing has been so profitable and has provided such consistent returns.
 
My Million Dollar Fundamental System
 
By: Larry Williams
 

The following is an excerpt from Larry Williams' The Future Millionaires Trading Course 
 

FUNDAMENTALS:  WHY THEY ARE IMPORTANT

 

The commodity market is unique because it is a realistic market based on supply/demand pressures.  In turn, these pressures are authentic as they are based upon actual need of commodity processors.  Because of this, the overall fundamental structure is of vital importance.

 

As a trader you must be concerned with the fundamental view.  It will dictate whether you are long or short a particular commodity as well as enable you to better evaluate the risk in a position you are taking.

 

Larry Williams' Million Dollar Fundamental System
The Shoestring Millionaire"
 
5 little known wealth generating secrets that can help you amass a 7-figure retirement fortune. . .in as little as 24 months!
 
INCLUDING:
 
*  The only investment that has consistently outperformed the stock Shoestring Millionairemarket for more than 6 decades. . .and it's NOT real estate. . .see page 7  
 
*  A "seasonal" investment you can make only once a year. But it recently beat the S&P 500 by a whopping 830%. . .see page 9
 
*  How a "conservative" investor accumulated $1.051 Million in his portfolio. . .in just 24 months. . .page 5 inside
 
*  Wealth building "no-brainer" - this little-known profit generator can double your money every year, as regular as clockwork. . .page 10 
 
*  And much more
 

PLEASE READ.  Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results.  There is a substantial risk of loss trading commodities with or without this or any other advertised product, service or system.  Also hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations.  Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading.  Since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under-or-over compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity.  Simulated trading programs in general are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight.  No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown.